Skip to content

My personal take on the Microsoft bid for Yahoo

I’ve been using Yahoo! since before they were a company, since they were a hostname at Stanford.edu. Yahoo! Mail has been a faithful old standby for me for years. Even when I was paying for Apple’s .Mac services, including email, for about five years, I still had the rock of Yahoo! as a fallback. Once I got into Google’s Gmail, I realized I couldn’t justify paying Apple a yearly fee when I could get more and better service for free from online sources. So while Gmail has become my most important personal email tool, I still depend on, and trust, Yahoo! Mail for most of my online contacts.

For search, I primarily use Google, like most people, and occasionally use Yahoo! search, either by accident or because I want a different perspective. I never use Microsoft for web search, because the results usually don’t get me where I want to go. It doesn’t matter.

When Microsoft announced its unsolicited bid for Yahoo!, my first reaction was dread. Such a merger of giants very rarely works, rarely delivers the promised shareholder value (disclosure: I do not own shares of any of them), and rarely benefits consumers. This isn’t just my observation - there’s a lot of factual support to be found via places like Tom Peters and Oligopoly Watch.

I have been contemplating for some time moving all my email to Google, and therefore changing contact and login information for some 300 sites where I currently use my Yahoo! info. A successful bid from Microsoft to buy Yahoo! would have hastened that decision and migration. Now that Microsoft has walked away from the bid, I am leaning more toward bailing out anyway, but at a more leisurely pace.

When the bid was first revealed, I read so much speculation on the web about the probability of the acquisition going through and about whether that was a good or bad thing for either company. By March, nearly everything I read from industry insiders all over the web was that the acquisition was inevitable, that Yahoo! would be forced to succumb, that Microsoft really badly needed Yahoo! and their search advertising business, etc. Now that the news is out that no deal will be made, the rampant majority opinion seems to be that Yahoo! is now doomed, walking away was the smartest thing Microsoft could do, etc. I hope that Yahoo! can fix their problems and that Microsoft can deliver on their promise to compete and innovate because I want to see all three - Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! - remain healthy and strong and competitive, each in their own way. Fight it out in the open market. I think that’s good for business and good for consumers.

StrengthsFinder Part 2 of 6 Intellection

This is part two in a six-part series on my StrengthsFinder 2.0 results. In part one, I introduced the whole strengths and talents idea from Tom Rath’s book. The basic premise is that one develops strengths by investing study and practice into areas where one already has a natural talent. The book and associated materials help you identify your talents and actions you can take to build on top of those talents.

The StrengthsFinder online assessment reports my Top 5 Talent Themes as:

  • Intellection
  • Adaptability
  • Learner
  • Analytical
  • Connectedness

When I read the book, I made it a point not to read any of the talent theme descriptions. I read their one-word titles, but none of the accompanying detail. Similar quizzes and tests have reported similar things—thinking, analysis, learning. I expected to see things like that in my SF2 results. From the names of the talent themes, I kind of expected to have on my list things like “Context” and maybe “Input”. But I got a slightly different Top 5 than I thought I would.

The first time I read the talent theme descriptions behind my Top 5, I felt a mixture of recognition of familiar concepts and a fairly strong reaction that something was wrong. At first look, I thought the assessment results were way off when it came to Adaptability and Connectedness. I will write about each talent theme in depth, each in its own post, but I can tell you now that I quickly discovered all five talent themes on my list are correct. It was a matter of reading all of the description material with an open mind, re-reading it, and realizing what parts applied to me the most. I think this is the right way anyone taking the SF2 test should approach the results.

The description of Intellection, from the StrengthsFinder Full Theme Descriptions, says that I like to think, I like mental activity and introspection, and that “this mental hum is one of the constants of your life.”

thinker
Photo by Corey / Ten0fnine

This is the part that jumped out at me: “You are the kind of person who enjoys your time alone because it is your time for musing and reflection.” Boy, is that true. It’s no surprise to me that Intellection was my #1 talent theme. Interesting that it’s called a “talent” theme. It seems to me that this one, more than the others in my Top 5, is mostly about what I like or need versus what I may be good at or what may come naturally easy to me. But I can extrapolate from “you like to think” to “a need for mental activity”.

I’ve read others’ reactions to their own StrengthsFinder results where Intellection was one of their top 5. Almost to a person, their first reaction is, “doesn’t everyone like to think?”. Those people must be missing the point. It’s more than “everyone thinks”, for sure. But it’s not true to say “everyone likes to think”.

In my particular combination of talents in my Top 5—the talent themes, their order, and how I scored in each theme—the StrengthsFinder site gave me a personalized guide. This goes beyond the standard full theme description and tells me a “what makes you stand out” description that’s tailored especially for me. In My Personalized Guide, the StrengthsFinder description of Intellection as it applies to me specifically gets a lot more precise and applicable to me, personally. In particular, it says I appreciate intellectual discussions, I like to expand my knowledge by reading a lot, I examine ideas, theories, etc., from a variety of angles, and I desire to seek the truth. All true.

inside my brain
Photo by Gisela Giardino

This is where the Intellection description got most interesting for me. Different than the more general stock description, this personalized description zeroes in a lot closer to me. First, it indicates I like to periodically expand my knowledge by reading. That’s very true, and I’d go further—I love to read and I am reading all the time, all kinds of materials, in all kinds of media. I don’t do it only to be entertained or simply to pass the time, I do it to know more.

Second, they used language that gives me better insight about how Intellection applies to me. The full description has language such as “you like to…”. This personalized description has language such as “driven by your talents, you periodically…” That’s a significant choice of wording, because now I can see what “you like to think” means in the context of a talent as opposed to a mere preference.

Thinking is not merely daydreaming or fantasizing, although it is a superset of those two along with many other intellectual activities. The full description says this mental activity may be about solving a problem, or developing an idea. I’ve always done a lot of “what if” thinking. Like the fun old question that keeps getting asked of every new generation: If you had a super power what would it be and why? Except I think it through and try not to miss any constraints or implications.

How does one say “I like to think” or “one of my top talents is thinking” without sounding superior and pretentious? Go back and read your personalized guide again, that’s how. As the full theme description says, “The exact focus [of my mental activity] will depend on your other strengths.” I found that to be true as I read and thought about the descriptions of the other talent themes in my Top 5. I will go into the details of these interactions in the upcoming posts remaining in this series.

If you’ve taken the StrengthsFinder 2.0 assessment and want to share your results or discuss anything I’ve written here, leave a comment or contact me via email. If you’ve just got questions about any of this, feel free to contact me, too—I love to hear from readers and I love to share thoughts about this topic.

My Mourning Jacket

My grandmother died recently, almost two weeks after suffering a stroke. She’d lived her entire life in Kansas. My sister and her family live near where my grandmother died, a few miles away in another town. All the children, grandchildren, great- and great-great-grandchildren were going to converge on the spot for the funeral. Grandma wanted her grandsons and great-grandsons to be pallbearers. That’s where I came in.

My next work project had already started. I had to be in Seattle the next Sunday night so I could begin a workshop with my client bright and early Monday morning. The prep work for this kind of workshop is long and intensive, and the funeral was going to put a crater in my week. But we don’t choose when we’re going to pass after something incapacitating like a stroke. There was never any question I was going to go be part of the funeral.

I made my travel arrangements. I could pay for a flight out of my frequent flier miles on United. The little Kansas town is Pittsburg, halfway between Kansas City and Tulsa. I needed to get there in time for the services Wednesday afternoon. Nothing from Denver to Tulsa would get me there in time, considering I’d have to drive more than two hours from anywhere I touched down. So I got a flight to Kansas City Tuesday night. I’d be able to drive without it getting too late, and without me getting too sleepy behind the wheel.

I planned to stay in Kansas Wednesday night, then fly home to Denver Thursday morning. On Friday, I’d have to drive my wife to the airport so she could fly to Chicago to visit her ailing father. She’d be coming home late Sunday night, but I’d be leaving for Seattle early Sunday afternoon. So we would miss each other in transit. I arranged for our next door neighbor to take care of our dogs for several hours until my wife got home. In the meantime, in addition to prepping for work, I’d be setting things up for the dogs and neighbor and getting a few things in place for my wife while I was gone for the next five days. The weekend was going to be action-packed.

Tuesday came. I was ready in the afternoon, and getting from home to Kansas City was a breeze. I travel a lot for work, and it’s tiring but old hat now. In the car on the way to the Denver airport, I realized I had forgotten to bring a light winter coat. I had checked the weather forecast for that part of Kansas, and I knew there were severe thunderstorms predicted for Wednesday night through the first half of Thursday. But the weather in Denver was so sunny and mild that I completely forgot. I decided to buy a light coat when I got there. I would be driving past much of a major metro area and was sure I’d find something.

The Kansas City airport is a dump. Maybe I’m spoiled by Denver International Airport, the crown jewel of America’s air transportation system. I had brought my work laptop in the naïve belief I’d be able to do some work while not involved in family matters. I’ve got a card for it that lets me get online almost anywhere. I found a place to sit in the KC airport, got online, and looked for locations of Kohl’s and Wal-marts along my route. Time was a critical factor, because I would have just enough to make it to the Pittsburg Wal-mart if everything went right. But it was April and I knew my chances of finding any cold weather garments would be dwindling as the seasons changed. I headed for the Hertz rental car counter.

The Kansas City Hertz rental car system is broken. Long waits while the agents looked for available cars, Gold reservations unconfirmed because of stupid business rules, etc. I don’t want to waste time writing any more about them. I finally got my car and left the rental lot. Within minutes I was headed the wrong direction on the highway. Wrong turns and u-turns were the rule for the next hour thanks to Kansas City’s pathetic and confusing highway signs and names. One such wrong turn put me in Olathe, Kansas. I knew how to get on the right track from there. The silver lining was that I was in a retail district and almost immediately spotted a Target. I stopped and went inside.

The clearance racks in the men’s department were full of some things that might have worked for me, but they were all in sizes small to medium, which wouldn’t fit, or extra large to extra-extra large, which would just look ridiculous. Also, men in Kansas apparently wear a lot of caps – baseball, golf, trucker – and pullover sweatshirts.

Back on the road, my next chance was the Wal-mart in Fort Scott, Kansas. Time was running out, I was getting hungry, and I was happy to see the Wal-mart as I pulled into town. If I could find what I needed there, I wouldn’t have to speed like I’d been doing, past farms and cows for the last two hours. It was dark now, the temperature was dropping and the wind was growing. This store had a greater selection of everything – the hats and sweatshirts and more seasonal items and even one or two attractive jackets – but it was still all the wrong size. Some of it would have been inappropriate for the time, anyway. So I headed to a checkout lane and bought two protein bars and two bottles of water. I waited while a family paid for groceries ahead of me. I rushed back to the car and headed south to my last chance.

The Wal-mart in Pittsburg, Kansas, is mercifully located at the north end of town. I knew from the web lookup I had done three hours earlier in Kansas City that the stores along my way would close at 10:00. I pulled into the parking lot at 9:48. Inside, there were tempting t-shirts from all the local schools – Frontenac, Girard, Pittsburg, Columbus, even Pittsburg State University. I found lots of casual winter outerwear possibilities, too. Almost all of the items were mediums – too small for me. There were some smalls, some XXLs. In the last corner, I found a clearance rack. It was like others I’d seen earlier in the night – nylon shells for golfers, breathable tops for runners, tracksuit slouchwear. There was a black and dark-blue jacket, it looked like a combination of some water-resistant polyester panels and polar fleece. Size large. My size. I pulled it on. I couldn’t believe my luck. It fit, looked appropriate, wasn’t too light or too heavy, had deep pockets. I checked the rack for others, but in my hands was the only one in my size. It had been marked down due to the approach of Spring, and the price was finally $7.

At the checkout lane, I waited while a group of four young men bought beer and cigarettes ahead of me. I paid for the jacket and made happy small talk with the little old cashier. She thoughtfully asked if I wanted to wear the jacket out, and I said I did. She apologized that she didn’t have a way to cut off the tag hanging from my jacket, but I assured her it was okay. I put it on while walking out the door at 10:02, and at that hour in that weather it was the warmest and most perfect jacket I had ever owned. I bit through the tag’s plastic ring with my teeth while I watched the guys from the checkout lane speed away in their truck. I zipped the jacket, got in my car, and cruised slowly to the south side of Pittsburg, to the Econo-Lodge where I had reserved a room. That jacket kept me warm and dry for the entire trip, and I took it with me to Seattle the next week and the week after that. I’ll have that jacket for a long time.

my mourning jacket

StrengthsFinder Part 1 of 6 Introduction

Updated 5/10/08: This is part 1 of my 6-part series on my StrengthsFinder 2.0 results. I’ll update this post as I complete the other parts of the series.

  1. Introduction
  2. Intellection
  3. Adaptability
  4. Learner
  5. Analytical
  6. Connectedness

I listed my StrengthsFinder 2.0 results in an earlier post, with no commentary about the ideas in the book or the details behind each talent theme. Maybe you have heard of it. Here is a little background.

sundial
Photo by Wally Gobetz

The Gallup organization has been studying human strengths for 40 years, and they developed the Clifton StrengthsFinder assessment to help people discover and develop their talents. It’s a quick online tool that will report to you your top five dominant talent themes, along with a customized detailed guide and action planner.

Talents are your natural ways of thinking, feeling, or behaving. Strength is the ability to provide consistent near-perfect performance. Talents, knowledge, skills, and practice combine to create your strengths. To build your strength, you must invest in your innate talent with time spent practicing, developing skills, and building knowledge.

The StrengthsFinder assessment differs from the Myers-Briggs profile test, in that it focuses on finding and developing your dominant talents as opposed to providing a general description of your personality profile.

The Gallup people found lots of talents and were able to group them into 34 unique talent themes. Discovering your talents is only the beginning, because then it is up to you to take action, to invest in yourself, in order to develop your strengths. Why is it important to understand what your natural talents are? Because a talent is a multiplier of investment. You can study something a whole lot, practice long hard hours, and it will never become one of your strengths if you don’t have a talent to multiply all that studying and practice.

We are more engaged and happy when working in our strengths than when working at something for which we have no talent. The Gallup studies discovered that people have several times more potential for growth when they invest energy in developing their strengths instead of correcting their deficiencies. The book challenges the traditional “find your weaknesses and work on improving them” idea, calling such activity “the path of most resistance.” Their bottom line: “You cannot be anything you want to be - but you can be a lot more of who you are already are.”

sf2

I first heard about StrengthsFinder in its first incarnation, when I heard about the book Now, Discover Your Strengths. Then someone on my team at work had gotten into StrengthsFinder 2.0, then got our manager involved, and she financed everyone’s purchase of the book because she believed in it so much. I’m glad she did, because I’ve found it all very beneficial.

I will write a detailed post for each of my top five talent themes. I’ll write how I initially reacted to the report and the theme description , and I’ll relate what I learned and where I went from there. To recap, here are my Top 5, in descending order:

  1. Intellection - “People who are especially talented in the Intellection theme are characterized by their intellectual activity. They are introspective and appreciate intellectual discussions”
  2. Adaptability - “People who are especially talented in the Adaptability theme prefer to ‘go with the flow.’ They tend to be ‘now’ people who take things as they come and discover the future one day at a time.”
  3. Learner - “People who are especially talented in the Learner theme have a great desire to learn and want to continuously improve. In particular, the process of learning, rather than the outcome, excites them.”
  4. Analytical - “People who are especially talented in the Analytical theme search for reasons and causes. They have the ability to think about all the factors that might affect a situation.”
  5. Connectedness - “People who are especially talented in the Connectedness theme have faith in the links between all things. They believe there are few coincidences and that almost every event has a reason.”

Every Week

I’ve started a creative photography project with one of my best friends in the whole world, Melinda Miller. Over the years, we’ve encouraged each other’s artistic pursuits—writing, drawing, painting, shooting photos, etc.

I started an art journal swap with her over a year ago. We draw or paint something in one of two Moleskines—a small sketchbook and a Japanese book—and get togther periodically to swap them and create the next work. And so on, and so on. That project hasn’t moved as fast as either of us woud have liked, I think, but to our credit we haven’t stopped and are going to make it to the ends of the journals. At some point I want to scan the pages and display them in a section of this web site.

The new project is our first photography collaboration. I was inspired by another site where two friends, thousands of miles apart, posted pictures every day to a common site, and I figured we could do that, too. Not only were the shots really good, but also the project as a whole was impressive. Melinda and I knew we couldn’t realistically commit to shooting and posting a photo every day. But we decided we could shoot and post one photo every seven days. We first talked about it a year ago or more, but we finally started a month ago. We post one photo each to our site, Every Week, on Sundays. We just posted the shots for Week 4.

We decided the first week would be portraits of each other, shot after a lunch at Panera. The second week would be self-portraits. After that, it would be a free-for-all. Melinda is a great photographer. Go see for yourself.

One of the reasons why I wanted to get this project off the ground was to force both of us to shoot more photos, to create more, and in the process I hoped we would be thinking and seeing more artistically all the time. I struggled to find my rhythm in the third week, but last week I started to hit my stride, shooting more and looking for more opportunities. The project has had the same effect on Melinda—she told me that she’s been shooting a lot this week and even had a hard time choosing just one photo to post for Week 4. I’m really excited about it, because I can see that what I had hoped would happen is actually happening.

So watch and see what the upcoming year looks like through our lenses. I will still be posting occasional photos over in my Flickr photostream, but the majority of the best of my new and old shots will go into my new photo gallery here, which is just getting underway.

Hooked on chart junk

I found the Song Chart group on Flickr by accident the other day. What you do is pick a song, create a chart or graph that illustrates the song, and post it to the Flickr group. The cheesier you can make the chart, the drier the humor, the more ridiculous the graphic effects, the better. And it’s best if you make it a good puzzle, and don’t list the song name or even the artist in the chart or title. I love stuff like this. It’s right up my alley. When the group was first formed, there were something around 140 pictures in it. I raced through them all. Most of them are very clever, and some of them are brilliant. I was instantly hooked.

Right away, a handful of charting opportunities came to my mind. In just a few minutes, I made this one and posted it (click to enlarge):

Song Chart 03

The response was phenomenal. It rapidly shot up over the next 24 hours to enter into my top 10 most-viewed pictures ever. I’ve got photos that had been there in my Flickr photostream for years whose position at the top were being threatened by this little thing that had only been alive for one day. Now I was finally getting to experience what it was like to be part of a hot Flickr fad. The first three charts I had posted all at once were proving to be among the more popular ones in the Song Chart group, especially that one about levees. More and more ideas occurred to me, I took a few minutes and created a couple more, and they also took off.

Then I took a concept-mapping view to a popular song by Barenaked Ladies, “The Old Apartment” (click to enlarge):

Song Chart 06

Not only did this fulfill all the nerdy promises of the Song Chart group, what with its cold examination of a loudly emotional song, but also I made the physical shape of the map resemble a crooked house. The popularity streak of this one diagram was, in a word, meteoric. Before this chart, my most popular photo, by number of views, was a black-and-white shot of a pencil and some notebooks. That one had been in my Flickr photostream for just over two years and had a respectable 1,700+ views and had been marked as a favorite by 14 other Flickr users. This one song chart racked up over 2,200 views, six faves, and six comments in less than 48 hours.

So far I’ve posted nine charts to the pool. Making these is a lot of fun, and a stimulating mental diversion for the end of a day. They don’t take much time to think up, but the more clever I can execute the ideas, the more rewarding the feedback is when someone gets the joke. I think I will keep making song charts, but I’ll stop posting them to Flickr. I don’t want them to take over my photostream any more than they already have. I’ll still post the really good ones.

My blog’s new home

jet engine and wing over snow landscape


I just changed where I host this blog, and in the process decided to do something different with this site overall. I took this photo one cold Friday morning as I was leaving Boise. It represents travel to me. It’s not only part of my job, but this whole blog is in transit at the moment. Expect more to change soon.

Top 3 Elton John songs that remind me of my middle brother

3. “Someone Saved My Life Tonight” - because when we were kids he changed the title to something rude that made me laugh
2. “Bennie and the Jets” - because he can whistle like the whistle in the second half of the song, and I never could

and…

1. “Daniel” - because Daniel, my brother, you are older than me

I got some good advice

Some wise and seasoned professionals gave me some good advice over the last three years.

  • Show me the output.
    This is my paraphrase. To others, it might be stated as “a bias for action”. Either way, I try to remind myself that the point of work is to produce.
  • Have a methodology.
    Not only will being methodical help order my work, but also it reduces stress. I’d rather spend time creating solutions instead of winging it without a methodology.
  • You are entitled.
    This one has a wide range of meaning and applicability, from getting what I need to do my job to getting some distance when I need it.
  • You are not the client.
    This work is all about relationships and teamwork, but I am the advisor (and sometimes only the catalyst) - not the client.
  • Are you hired to do what you’re told, or is it your job to make expert recommendations?
    Like the others, this question had a profound effect on me. I see all the ones I look up to following this rule.
  • Finally, from the great Tom Peters: Fail. Forward. Fast.
    This small phrase sums up so much great advice. Basically, it means “make mistakes”. Got an idea? Act on it, fast. Learn from what worked and what didn’t work. Fix it, extend it, start over, rebuild it if necessary. But make progress. See what didn’t work and learn from the experience. Iterate.

Top 3 rules for your first night in an eastern city

Ignore these at your peril.

  1. Iron all your wrinkled clothes—because you don’t want to have to iron when all you really want is hit snooze one more time
  2. Get to bed by 10:00—do whatever you have to do in order to sleep
  3. Take a shower as the first thing you do after waking the next morning—before anything else